Masthead header

Digital & film :: June 27

Laurin_Jonathan_film

Laurin_Jonathan

I don’t mention this too much, but I shoot both film and digital–each for their own purposes. The actual delivery medium doesn’t matter as much to me as the results, but each has its charms.

BW film, in particular, is a great way to get a certain kind of tonality quickly, so I use it to do that. Especially when I have time, like in a portrait or engagement session, I like to “go back” to shooting on film.

Can you achieve the same results with digital, too? Of course you can, but it helps if you know what film should look like to begin with, and to me that’s important.

But why? Why bother with “looking like film at all?”

Well, film is a mature medium, especially compared with digital, and a lot of time and effort went into detailing a system for capture, manipulation (in the darkroom) and print presentation. Most digital images, right out of the camera, fall far short of the range of tones and all-round excellence you can expect from the many kinds of film.

Believe it or not, we’re all pretty sophisticated when it comes to seeing beautiful images. So much work I see today is manipulated in post-processing to destroy detail (by crushing contrast) and delicacy of expression (by washing out tonality) that it’s refreshing to go back to the simple pleasures of film–and it continues to inspire me for my digital work too!

Laura_Robin_film

Jenn_Chris_filmOh–and here’s a couple of digital shot similar to the last one and from the same e-session (which got lost in my blog re-design!):

Jenn_Chris_digitalJenn_Chris_digitalAll of these were taken with a Leica Noctilux f1.0 lens, except for the wider angle shot of Jenn & Chris and the skyline, which was shot with the Leica 35 Summilux ASPH. Everything was shot on a Leica M6 (film) or M9 (digital).

Light, moment & composition:: June 27

Shannon & Henry: first dance

 

Technology changes very quickly–but our appreciation of the impact of art stays the same, a lot of the time.

I just read the other day of another big change in the medium of photography. A company called Lytro (www.lytro.com) has announced a digital camera that records the entire “light-field” of a scene. This kind of camera, with help from sophisticated software, lets the photographer choose a focus point, among other things, after the picture has been taken!

Now, there are a number of limitations to the technology, not the least of which is that initial cameras will probably not offer much in the way of printable resolution–only 1mp or maybe a bit more is where these devices are going to start. I also have to say that so far, the effects I’ve seen with samples, while very interesting and encouraging, is somewhat limited in terms of spatial arrangement and emphasis, to say the least.

But even so, this is a real change in the way pictures will be taken, and a lot of Internet forums are buzzing with photographers who find this fascinating and those who find it downright scary! And regardless of the argument, the future is sure to bring more and more previously “un-thought-of” technologies to bear on the art of photography.

But some things don’t change at all: to successfully recreate the emotions of an event or create visual tension in a photograph, the photographer will still need to concentrate on three elements: light, moment, and overall composition.

Light and shadows shape the world we see, and is the primary way to tell a visual photographic story (even the word photography literally means “light-writing”). Light sets a mood,  isolates or connects things, and leads your eye into and around a picture. Shadows give us familiar faces and expressions and help make sense of our visual world. In classic photography, the amount of light through the lens is also associated with the ability of a photographer to use a lens to isolate focus and show you what’s most important in the picture.

Moment or gesture also makes a photograph interesting. As a medium, photography’s great strength is to play with time: to select a fraction of a second and show that moment as static, or to merge those fractions together to fuse moments into the fluidity of motion we often feel but never really see. In a more obvious way, moments that pass between people, or around them, are historical and can genuinely express a moment’s meaning or importance. Traditionally, a picture’s fluidity of time–including the ability to isolate a decisive or expressive moment–is associated with the photographer’s ability to select the right shutter timing to freeze or blur elements.

Because photography is a two dimensional art as well, composition also plays a huge a role in how we see what we see in a picture. The arrangement of all the elements in the frame helps draw your eye into the moment and should complement the light and gesture, so the story is told “in an instant.”

Put all three of these together–a command of light, the ability to capture a moment and show gesture, and a powerful composition–and you have a great, expressive photograph.

These are the things that my favourite photographs bring together, and it’s this union of expression and substance that I strive for with my wedding and portrait work.

Regardless of the technology that comes along, these things are not likely to change very much.

more mixed light & colour :: June 17

Jenn & Chris | The Distillery District Toronto | Leica Noctilux 1.0 @ f2; M9

Another boost of warmth from tungsten light that happens to be flooding the background. As I mentioned in the “rainy day” post, you generally like to avoid mixed light, but in this case the sunset sky was just light enough to give nice skin tones from daylight while the tungsten works to amplify the colour and express emotion.

The venue is the Toronto Distillery district. We had a load of fun on Toronto Island and back in the Distillery too, just as the sun had set.

And that’s another Noctilux 1.0 M9 shot, this time the Noctilux is stopped down to make sure both Jenn and Scott are in focus. As you can see here, though, it’s very flare-resistant and gives fine detail throughout a shot. In this one, I didn’t have to add much contrast at all. The camera here is the Leica M9, a wonderful tool for creative expression, not in the least because its colour capability in these conditions is exceptionally good.

The Noctilux is not just a one-trick 50mm lens, either. It really is a superb 50mm lens with lots of  detail stopped down. For proof, look at the top of this blog. That’s also a Noctilux shot–and also from Jenn and Scott’s engagement–but this time the Noctilux / M9 combination is recording them looking over the Toronto sky line at f5.6, so you can see them and the skyline in detail, even in the Web-sized shot.

cold and rainy :: June 17

Allison & Duncan, Halton Museum, Milton

We’ve had a really cold and wet wedding season so far! In May you didn’t really even need a forecast…

So for this week’s picture I thought I’d use something that illustrates both the weather *and* a photographic  problem turned into a solution: mixed light. Photographers usually–and with good reason–hate mixed light.

Mixed light is light of different colour temperatures that come from different light sources. Different temperature light falling on a subject means–whether you’re shooting film or digital–the subject will have different colour casts. To get natural looking colour, photographers tend to prefer consistent light. That way, you can balance the colour well and have convincing colour tone across the image.  This is one reason I gel my flashes at a reception; I want the colour of my flash to look more like the reception lights than daylight (which is, generally speaking, a flash head’s colour balance).

So at Allison and Duncan’s wedding in May, it was cold. And wet… all day. This quick shot of them by a light fixture on the wall came late afternoon, and was one of our quick trips outside!

Here  you see the light on them being contributed by the ambient–and very dull–daylight, and the light behind them coming from the light fixture on the wall. Wonderfully, the black umbrella that they needed for the rain shielded their faces so there’s good and consistent skin tones, while the “out of colour balance” tungsten light lends a lot of warmth to what otherwise would simply be cold and dull. That warmth “naturally” surrounds them in this shot, and so I like the fact that the light lends emotional strength to the moment’s emotional value.

And given the weather we’ve been having lately, there’s nothing wrong with a little more warmth:)

expressionism & romance :: june 10


Laurin & Jonathan, Leica Noctilux 1.0 @ 1.0; M9

 

The impact of romance, of our connections, of the ongoing importance of what we feel together: how do you create that, photographically?

What better place to start with for a blog about the art of wedding photography than with expressionism?

It’s true, a lot of what I try to do with my work, along with what many of the best photographers I admire, is document the way a wedding day unfolds in what’s become known as a “photojournalistic” but compelling style. But that’s not to say that that the pictures are devoid of emotional content, or that the impact the situation makes on the me isn’t important, or that it doesn’t need to be interpreted. I also really do prefer naturalistic photography–simple (looking) photographic expression–even if done right, those shots are not simple at all in concept or execution.

Every now and then, though, you can push through to something more emotional. When it all comes together playing with the sun and the shade, a hat, and a moment between two people, then you can express more than just the particulars of the day, and get at something more interesting.

I should say that I’m totally not against post-processing images either to get that kind of emotional or communicative impact. We did the same kinds of things in the darkroom to make something look more dense or more sharp, or to lighten parts of an image and draw your eye through the picture,  or to darken it and keep things hidden. But there’s a fine balance between the photographic process, which is, for me, always about a moment, a gesture and how light illuminates that gesture, and a purely illustrative or painterly impulse, which creates those things after the fact (and often in spite of the fact).

But this image is pretty much straight out of the Leica M9 camera. On the technical side of things, the lens–the Leica f1 Noctilux–is actually incredibly flare-resistant. It’s really meant for shooting when the light is very low. But when pushed as it is here by the direct sun, and shot wide open (at f1.0), it flares in a spectacularly predictable and colorful fashion (without, by the way, losing contrast or focus through the whole image, which is quite impressive, to say the least!).    The M9 was actually set to ISO 1600 for this shot, but any noise you’re seeing is JPEG compression for the blog. What the high ISO did was add a little kick by compressing the tones and building contrast (the Noctilux retains a lot of detail and pushing the ISO is one way to compress that without a computer;))